Notes
Outline
Freedom of Expression
A  Historical  Overview
1735 - Present
The Zenger Trial
1735  John Peter Zenger published the  New York Weekly Journal.
He criticized the Royal Governor of N.Y.
Governor threw Zenger in jail.
Andrew Hamilton defends him in trial - he is found innocent by jury.
Sets up tradition of “freedom of the press” means __________________________
Early use of Freedom of Speech
Thomas Paine writes “Common Sense” which influences colonists to rebel and seek independence from Britain.
Thomas Jefferson writes “ Declaration of Independence”  - colonies break away from Britain.
Thomas Jefferson “Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.” (1787)
Constitutional Basis
Bill of Rights  guarantees personal freedoms
First Amendment of the Constitution states: Congress must not interfere with freedom of religion, speech or press, assembly and petition.
This means what? _________________
Laws/Actions limiting Freedom of Speech
1798-Alien and Sedition Act  - if one impeded policies of gov. or defamed officials, they received fines and jail time. During unofficial war with France. (Expired 1801)
1861- Pres. Abraham Lincoln suspends rights like “habeas corpus” and certain newspapers, during Civil War
More Laws/Actions regarding Freedom of Speech
1917  Espionage and Sedition Acts - limits what can be said and who can say it during World War I. Many German-Americans and socialists get prosecuted (1,900 cases)
1950’s  Red Scare/McCarthyism- fear of communism leads to trials and jail time
1999- Supreme Court rules that schools are liable for harassment of students by other students.
Supreme Court Rulings
“Schenck v. United States” (1919)  - Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes states  “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic… the question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such nature as to create a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.”
Conclusion
When does the government limit the freedom of speech?
What does the decision mean in“Schenck v. U.S.”
Do you think the government has the right to limit free speech?
Should people be able to say whatever they want to you? Why or why not?
The End! ThankYou